United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has long been disinclined to be constrained by the tenets of protocol, ethical codes or the precepts of the US Constitution or The Judiciary Act of 1789. She selfishly refuses to leave the court; apathetic to or oblivious of the detriment, to the court’s integrity, exacerbated by each of her unethical indulgences.
Ginsburg violated the Code of Conduct for United States Judges when she publicly cast aspersions on a presidential candidate. Then, after that candidate became President of the United States, she participated in rendering a court decision unfavorable to him; and boasted about it to young law students.
Notwithstanding the fact that no court is empowered to alter or invalidate duly enacted legislation or an executive order as a remedy in any case; at the very least she should have recused herself in view of her publicly stated, vitriolic bias against the President; and the fact that eight other justices found no problem with her antics is testament to the profound corruption of the court itself.
Ginsburg has previously revealed her unfitness to sit on the court in her own words.
“I see my advocacy as part of an effort to make the equality principle everything the founders would have wanted it to be if they weren’t held back by the society in which they lived,”.
An “advocate”, by definition, is biased, which contravenes the constitutional mandate for judicial impartiality. Also, “the founders” provided a mechanism for the Constitution to remain relevant despite societal evolution; Article V or the US Constitution. It is by no means a function of the judiciary.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a pernicious threat to democracy and if she continues to refuse to leave the court, congress should move to impeach her the next time she patently violates the Constitution; which she will, because she apparently cannot comprehend the impropriety of her actions.